All patients with heart disease or who have suffered a stroke or mini stroke ( TIA ) are offered a yearly review of how they are doing and their medication.The review is carried out by our nurse practitioner Gill Long.
Why take statins for your cholesterol? - the science.
Akira Endoand Masao Kuroda ofTokyo,Japancommenced research into inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase in 1971 (Endo 1992). This team reasoned that certain microorganisms may produce inhibitors of the enzyme to defend themselves against other organisms, asmevalonateis a precursor of many substances required by organisms for the maintenance of their cell wall (ergosterol) orcytoskeleton(isoprenoids).[2]
The first agent isolated wasmevastatin(ML-236B), a molecule produced by the fungusPenicillium citrinum. Thepharmaceutical companyMerck & Co.showed an interest in the Japanese research in 1976, and isolatedlovastatin(mevinolin, MK803), the first commercially marketed statin, from the fungusAspergillus terreus. Dr. Endo was awarded the 2006Japan Prizefor his work on the development of statins, and the Clinical Medical Research Award from the Lasker Foundation in 2008.
By inhibiting HMG-CoA reductase, statins block the pathway for synthesizing cholesterol in the liver. This is significant because most circulating cholesterol comes from internal manufacture rather than the diet. When the liver can no longer produce cholesterol, levels of cholesterol in the blood will fall. Cholesterol synthesis appears to occur mostly at night,[3]so statins with shorthalf-livesare usually taken at night to maximize their effect. Studies have shown greater LDL and total cholesterol reductions in the short-acting simvastatin taken at night rather than the morning,[4][5]but have shown no difference in the long-acting atorvastatin.[6]
Liver cellssense the reduced levels of liver cholesterol and seek to compensate by synthesizingLDL receptorsto draw cholesterol out of the circulation.[7]This is accomplished viaproteaseenzymes that cleave a protein called "membrane-boundsterol regulatory element binding protein", which migrates to thenucleusand causes increased production of various other proteins and enzymes, including theLDL receptor. The LDL receptor then relocates to the livercell membraneand binds to passingLDLandVLDLparticles (the "bad cholesterol" linked to disease). LDL and VLDL are drawn out of circulation into the liver and are digested.
Statins exhibit action beyond lipid-lowering activity in the prevention ofatherosclerosis. TheASTEROID trialshowed directultrasoundevidence ofatheromaregression during statin therapy.[8]Researchers hypothesize that statins preventcardiovascular diseasevia four proposed mechanisms (all subjects of a large body of biomedical research):[9]
Statins may even benefit those without high cholesterol. In 2008 the JUPITER study showed fewer stroke, heart attacks, and surgeries even for patients who had no history ofhigh cholesterolor heart disease, but only elevatedC-reactive proteinlevels. There were also 20% fewer deaths (mainly from reduction in cancer deaths) though deaths from cardiovascular causes were not reduced.[10]
Statins have been linked to a marked reduction in prostate cancer, benign prostate enlargement, incontinence and impotence in older men.[11]
Statins, the most potent cholesterol-lowering agents available, lowerLDL cholesterol(so-called "bad cholesterol") by 1.8 mmol/l. This translates in a 60% decrease in the number of cardiac events (heart attack, sudden cardiac death), and a 17% reduced risk ofstroke.[12]They have less effect than thefibratesorniacinin reducingtriglyceridesand raisingHDL-cholesterol("good cholesterol"). Professional guidelines generally require that the patient has tried a cholesterol-lowering diet before statin use is considered; statins or other pharmacologic agents may then be recommended for patients who do not meet their lipid-lowering goals through diet and lifestyle approaches.
The indications for the prescription of statins have broadened over the years. Initial studies, such as theScandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study(4S), supported the use of statins insecondary preventionfor cardiovascular disease, or as primary prevention only when the risk for cardiovascular disease was significantly raised (as indicated by theFramingham risk score).[13]Indications were broadened considerably by studies such as theHeart Protection Study(HPS), which showed preventative effects of statin use in specific risk groups, such asdiabetics. TheASTEROID trial, published in 2006, using only a statin at high dose, achieved lower than usual target calculated LDL values and showed disease regression within thecoronary arteriesusingintravascular ultrasonography.[8]
LDL-lowering potency varies between agents. Cerivastatin is the most potent, followed by (in order of decreasing potency), rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, simvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, and fluvastatin.[19]The relative potency of pitavastatin has not yet been fully established.
Some types of statins are naturally occurring, and can be found in such foods asoyster mushrooms[20]andred yeast rice. Randomized controlled trials found them to be effective, but the quality of the trials was low.[21].
No large scale comparison exists that examines the relative effectiveness of the various statins against one another for preventing hard cardiovascular outcomes, such as death or myocardial infarction.
An independent analysis has been done to compare atorvastatin, pravastatin and simvastatin, based on their effectiveness againstplacebos. It found that, at commonly prescribed doses, there are nostatistically significantdifferences amongst statins in reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.[22]The CURVES study, which compared the efficacy of different doses of atorvastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, and fluvastatin for reducing LDL and total cholesterol in patients with hypercholesterolemia, found that atorvastatin was more effective without increasing adverse events.[23]
Statins differ in their ability to reduce cholesterol levels. Doses should be individualized according to patient characteristics such as goal of therapy and response. After initiation and/or dose changes, lipid levels should be analyzed within 1–3 months and dosage adjusted accordingly, then every 6–12 months afterwards.[24][25][26][27]
Statin Equivalent Dosages
% LDL Reduction (approx.)
Atorvastatin
Fluvastatin
Lovastatin
Pravastatin
Rosuvastatin
Simvastatin
10-20%
--
20 mg
10 mg
10 mg
--
5 mg
20-30%
--
40 mg
20 mg
20 mg
--
10 mg
30-40%
10 mg
80 mg
40 mg
40 mg
5 mg
20 mg
40-45%
20 mg
--
80 mg
80 mg
5–10 mg
40 mg
46-50%
40 mg
--
--
--
10–20 mg
80 mg
50-55%
80 mg
--
--
--
20 mg
--
56-60%
--
--
--
--
40 mg
--
Starting dose
Starting dose
10–20 mg
20 mg
10–20 mg
40 mg
10 mg; 5 mg if hypothyroid, >65 yo, Asian;
20 mg
If higher LDL reduction goal
40 mg if >45%
40 mg if >25%
20 mg if >20%
--
20 mg if LDL >190
40 mg if >45%
Optimal timing
Anytime
Evening
With evening meals
Anytime
Anytime
Evening
Safety
Adverse effects
Statins are perceived[29]as well-tolerated, and raised liver enzymes and muscle problems are the only common adverse effects. Reported adverse effects are low in clinical trials but "higher in studies of real world use", and more varied.[29]Statins increased the risk of an adverse effect by 39% compared to placebo (odds ratios1.4); two-thirds of these were myalgia or raised liver enzymes with serious adverse effects similar to placebo.[30]
While some patients on statin therapy reportmyalgias,[31]muscle cramps,[31]or far less-frequent gastrointestinal or other symptoms, similar symptoms are also reported with placebo use in all the large statin safety/efficacy trials and usually resolve, either on their own or on temporarily lowering/stopping the dose.Liver enzymederangements may also occur, typically in about 0.5%,[citation needed]are also seen at similar rates with placebo use and repeated enzyme testing, and generally return to normal either without discontinuance over time or after briefly discontinuing the drug. Multiple other side-effects occur rarely; typically also at similar rates with only placebo in the large statin safety/efficacy trials. Two randomized clinical trials found cognitive issues while two did not; recurrence upon reintroduction suggests that these are causally related to statins in some individuals.[32]One Danish study in 2002[33]suggested a relation between long term statin use and increased risk of nerve damage orpolyneuropathy[34]but suggested this side effect is "rare, but it does occur";[35]other researchers have pointed to studies of the effectiveness of statins in trials involving 50,000 people which have not shown nerve damage as a significant side effect.[36]
More serious but rare reactions includemyositisandmyopathy, with the potential forrhabdomyolysis(the pathological breakdown ofskeletal muscle) leading toacute renal failure.Coenzyme Q10(ubiquinone) levels are decreased in statin use;[37]Q10 supplements are sometimes used to treat statin-associated myopathy, though evidence of their effectiveness is currently lacking.[38]A common variation in theSLCO1B1gene, which participates in the absorption of statins, has been shown to significantly increase the risk of myopathy.[39]
Graham et al. (2004) reviewed records of over 250,000 patients treated from 1998 to 2001 with the statin drugs atorvastatin, cerivastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin.[40]The incidence of rhabdomyolyis was 0.44 per 10,000 patients treated with statins other than cerivastatin. However, the risk was over tenfold greater if cerivastatin was used, or if the standard statins (atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, simvastatin) were combined with fibrate (fenofibrate or gemfibrozil) treatment. Cerivastatin was withdrawn by its manufacturer in 2001.
All commonly used statins show somewhat similar results, however the newer statins, characterized by longer pharmacologicalhalf-livesand more cellular specificity, have had a better ratio ofefficacyto lower adverse effect rates. The risk of myopathy is lowest withpravastatinandfluvastatinprobably because they are more hydrophillic and as a result have less muscle penetration.Lovastatininduces the expression of gene atrogin-1, which is believed to be responsible in promoting muscle fiber damage.[41]
Despite initial concerns that statins might increase the risk ofcancer, various studies concluded later that statins have no influence on cancer risk (including theheart protection studyand a 2006meta-analysis[42]). Indeed, a 2005 trial showed that patients taking statins for over 5 yearsreducedtheir risk ofcolorectal cancerby 50%; this effect was not exhibited byfibrates. The trialists warn that thenumber needed to treatwould approximate 5000, making statins unlikely tools for primary prevention.[43]However, in a recent meta-analysis of 23 statin treatment arms with 309,506 person-years of follow-up, there was an inverse relationship between achieved LDL-cholesterol levels and rates of newly diagnosed cancer that the authors claim requires further investigation.[44]
Combining any statin with afibrate, another category of lipid-lowering drugs, increases the risks forrhabdomyolysisto almost 6.0 per 10,000 person-years.[40]Most physicians have now abandoned routine monitoring of liver enzymes andcreatine kinase, although they still consider this prudent in those on high-dose statins or in those on statin/fibrate combinations, and mandatory in the case of muscle cramps or of deterioration inrenal function.
Consumption ofgrapefruitorgrapefruit juiceinhibits the metabolism of statins—furanocoumarinsin grapefruit juice inhibit thecytochrome P450enzymeCYP3A4, which is involved in the metabolism of most statins (however it is a major inhibitor of only lovastatin, simvastatin and to a lesser degree atorvastatin) and some other medications[45](it had been thought thatflavonoidswere responsible). This increases the levels of the statin, increasing the risk of dose-related adverse effects (includingmyopathy/rhabdomyolysis). Consequently, consumption of grapefruit juice is not recommended in patients undergoing therapy with most statins. An alternative, somewhat risky, approach is that some users take grapefruit juice to enhance the effect of lower (hence cheaper) doses of statins. This is not recommended as a result of the increased risk and potential for statin toxicity.
Some scientists take a skeptical view of the need for many people to require statin treatment. Given the wide indications for which statins are prescribed, and the declining benefit in groups at lower baseline risk of cardiovascular events, the evidence base for expanded statin use has been questioned by some researchers.[48]A much smaller minority, exemplified byThe International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics, question the "lipid hypothesis" itself and argue that elevated cholesterol has not been adequately linked to heart disease. These groups claim that statins are not as beneficial or safe as suggested.[49]
^Saito Y; Yoshida S; Nakaya N; Hata Y; Goto Y (Jul-Aug 1991). "Comparison between morning and evening doses of simvastatin in hyperlipidemic subjects. A double-blind comparative study".Arterioscler Thromb11(4): 816–26.
^Wallace A; Chinn D; Rubin G (4 October 2003). "Taking simvastatin in the morning compared with in the evening: randomised controlled trial".British Medical Journal327(7418): 788.
^Cilla DD Jr; Gibson DM; Whitfield LR; Sedman AJ (July 1996).Pharmacodynamic effects and pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin after administration to normocholesterolemic subjects in the morning and evening.36. p. 604–9.
^Kodach LL, Bleuming SA, Peppelenbosch MP, Hommes DW, van den Brink GR, Hardwick JC. The effect of statins in colorectal cancer is mediated through the bone morphogenetic protein pathway.Gastroenterology2007 133:1272-81. | PMID: 17919499 |
^Golomb BA, Dimsdale JE, White HL, Ritchie JB, Criqui MH (April 2008). "Reduction in blood pressure with statins: results from the UCSD Statin Study, a randomized trial".Arch. Intern. Med.168(7): 721–7.doi:10.1001/archinte.168.7.721.PMID18413554.
^Shepherd J, Hunninghake DB, Barter P, McKenney JM, Hutchinson HG (2003). "Guidelines for lowering lipids to reduce coronary artery disease risk: a comparison of rosuvastatin with atorvastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin for achieving lipid-lowering goals".Am. J. Cardiol.91(5A): 11C–17C; discussion 17C–19C.doi:10.1016/S0002-9149(03)00004-3.PMID12646338.
^Gunde-Cimerman N, Cimerman A. (Mar 1995), "Pleurotus fruiting bodies contain the inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase-lovastatin.",Exp Mycol.19(1): 1–6,doi:10.1006/emyc.1995.1001,PMID7614366
^Zhou Z, Rahme E, Pilote L (2006). "Are statins created equal? Evidence from randomized trials of pravastatin, simvastatin, and atorvastatin for cardiovascular disease prevention".Am. Heart J.151(2): 273–81.doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2005.04.003.PMID16442888.
^Jones P, Kafonek S, Laurora I, Hunninghake D (1998). "Comparative dose efficacy study of atorvastatin versus simvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, and fluvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia (the CURVES study)".Am J Cardiol81(5): 582–7.doi:10.1016/S0002-9149(97)00965-X.PMID9514454.
^abGolomb BA, Evans MA (2008). "Statin adverse effects : a review of the literature and evidence for a mitochondrial mechanism".Am J Cardiovasc Drugs8(6): 373–418.PMID19159124.
^D. Gaist, MD PhD; U. Jeppesen, MD PhD,; M. Andersen, MD PhD; L. A. García Rodríguez, MD MSc; J. Hallas, MD PhD; S. H. Sindrup, MD PhD (2002;58). "Statins and risk of polyneuropathy -- A case-control study".Neurology(Denmark: American Academy of Neurology): pp. 1333–1337. Retrieved 2009-10-06.
^Ghirlanda G, Oradei A, Manto A, Lippa S, Uccioli L, Caputo S, Greco A, Littarru G (1993). "Evidence of plasma CoQ10-lowering effect by HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study".J Clin Pharmacol33(3): 226–9.PMID8463436.
^Marcoff L, Thompson PD (2007). "The role of coenzyme Q10 in statin-associated myopathy: a systematic review".J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.49(23): 2231–7.doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.02.049.PMID17560286.
^Alsheikh-Ali AA (2007). "Effect of the Magnitude of Lipid Lowering on Risk of Elevated Liver Enzymes, Rhabdomyolysis, and Cancer: Insights From Large Randomized Statin Trials".Journal of the American College of Cardiology50(5): 409–418.doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.02.073.PMID17662392.
^Iakoubova O, Marc S. Sabatine, Charles M. Rowland, et al. Polymorphism in KIF6 Gene and Benefit From Statins After Acute Coronary Syndromes. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2008; 51(4): 449-455.